Internet Marketing Monitor
December 19, 2006
Filed Under (Microsoft, Live.com/MSN, Yahoo) by Matt / Derick on 12-19-2006

When you're sitting pretty at No. 1, some of the worries, challenges, and focuses that the underdogs worry about fall away.  Such is Google… currently.  While they watch from the lofty perch of numero uno, Yahoo and Microsoft, Nos. 2 & 3, struggle to find ways to bring that perch a little closer to Earth.  I'm sure they'd love to actually push Google off the perch and listen in glee as the search giant crashes back down to the ground.

A lot of speculation is circulating about how that will happen, who will do it, and when it's going to happen.  Some say Yahoo is going to pull a miraculous recovery and reclaim it's top search spot.  Others say Google will continue to rein for as long as information needs to be indexed.  And Jeremy Schoemaker of Shoe Money thinks that Microsoft is going to buy Yahoo next year.  Schoemaker, in a post titled 10 Reasons Why Microsoft Will Acquire Yahoo in 2007, details the reasoning behind his prediction.

I don't think it will ever happen.  Coincidentally, I have a 10-point list of my own reasoning:

10 Reasons Why Microsoft Will Never Buy Yahoo

  1. First and foremost, Microsoft is way to proud to say they can't win on their own.  Come on… this is Microsoft we're talking about.  A purchase of Yahoo might help them out, but it would also signal defeat.  Microsoft doesn't do that, even when the federal government steps in.
  2. They don't need Yahoo Publisher Network.  Microsoft adCenter is much better than YPN already.  They might not have the search volume yet, but they've already got the infrastructure in place if/when that traffic arrives.
  3. Microsoft has the money to buy Yahoo.  But I don't expect them to spend that money on a dinosaur like Yahoo.  I think they'd be much more likely to buy a smaller, smarter company that they can bring into the public's eye as a "Microsoft product".  Too many people already know that Yahoo exists in it's present form.  Microsoft would be better off buying a great company that no one has heard of so that when it gets big (with Microsoft's help), it will have been a Microsoft product from day one… in the eyes of the consumers.
  4. I agree that Microsoft needs users, bad.  And yes, Yahoo has millions of users that might look good to Microsoft.  But look at the other players.  They all need users, they all need eyes, and they'd all probably love to get a stab at Yahoo's business.  Is it worth enough to Microsoft to fight all of the other companies out there for Yahoo?  I don't think it is.
  5. If a bidding war actually did break out, I'd expect eBay to buy Yahoo first.  Their growth is stagnating and a purchase like Yahoo would give them a big injection of new opportunity.  I'm willing to bet they're interested in becoming more of an "internet company" than just an auction site.
  6. Let's say Microsoft was interested in a Yahoo purchase.  I seriously doubt the FTC would allow it.  Microsoft doesn't always have the best rapport with the government, especially when it comes to acquisitions in crowded markets that Microsoft is publicly voicing the desire to dominate.
  7. Microsoft wins by copying what other companies are doing.  They try to make improvements and repackage things with that Microsoft touch, but it's basically copying.  Why spend the money to buy something as big as Yahoo when they could just keep working on their copy?
  8. Yahoo doesn't "get it".  I think some of the people at Microsoft do.  All Microsoft needs is time.  With Vista and IE7 they have a second chance and if that fails, they have IE8, 9, 10, etc.  Eventually they'll figure it out and win.  It's the Microsoft way.  IE1 - IE3 didn't do much to shake up Netscape and it might have looked then that Microsoft was fighting a losing battle.  Then *BOOM*… here comes IE4… and the face of the internet changed forever.  Ask Netscape.
  9. I see the Xbox helping Microsoft in the long term across all of its brands.  While there are quite a few grown adults addicted to their Xboxes, gaming systems are primarily marketed toward younger segments of the population.  Xbox Live is a big part of that.  People tend to stick with what they know and what they're used to.  If folks are using a Microsoft Xbox today, chances are they're going to use more Microsoft products in the future.  The same thing is happening to Apple because of the iPod.  If the iPod hadn't been such a huge success, Apple would have had much fewer new users today than it does.  We'll just called it Xbox Halo Effect (pun intended).
  10. I can see a lot of other interested parties that would be far more likely to buy Yahoo than Microsoft.  Berkshire Hathaway, The NY Times, Fox News Corp, IAC/InterActiveCorp to name a few out of a dozen or more.  IAC/InterActiveCorp has a great product with Ask.com.  If they could put their technology to use with Yahoo's millions of users they might stand a chance to take on Google.  But Microsoft?  No.  I don't think so.

I agree that it's only a matter of time before Yahoo is acquired by another company.  In fact, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if it happened inside of a year.  But Microsoft is no more likely to buy Yahoo than I am.  Bottom line:  it would be bad business for Microsoft.  And while they've had their fair share of bad business moves, I don't think Microsoft is stupid enough to make one of this scale.

Related Posts & Pages Recent Posts



Comments:
3 Comments posted on "10 Reasons Why Microsoft Will NEVER Acquire Yahoo"

[…] As well as this post at the Internet Marketing Monitor Blog, which gives you 10 reasons as to why Microsoft Will Not Aquire Yahoo in 2007! […]


[…] The story is a response to an article on Shoemoney.com that asserts Microsoft will buy Yahoo in 2007. The author doesn’t agree and has 10 reasons to support his opinion. Among others, he says it would be a bad business move and that Microsoft would be better off buying a small, unknown company that it could bring to the public eye as its own.read more | digg story […]


[…] While Interesting in Theory, a Yahoo-Microsoft Joint Search Engine Will Never Happen Posted by Derick on March 14th, 2007 There's been a lot of talk, speculation, and predicting going on in the blogosphere about the future of Yahoo.  Top amongst the rumors and speculation for a while was the idea of a Microsoft buyout of Yahoo.  We don't see that happening.   John Battelle has proposed another scenario that one could argue was even more radical:  a Microsoft / Yahoo joint venture spin-off search company.   In his scenario, Battelle suggests that the best way for Microsoft and Yahoo to do battle with Google is to join forces on a new, separate company jointly-owned, financed, and managed by the two technology companies.  Yahoo would provide the bulk of the technology and Microsoft, with its deep pockets, would provide the majority of the funding.   By combining their resources and using their individual strengths, the joint company would be able to deliver a product superior to both Yahoo and Microsoft's individual offerings. Battelle also suggests that both companies would then be able to put their individual resources back on their primary businesses:  So why not join forces, like back in the good old days when Overture fed both Yahoo and Microsoft? Such a venture solves any number of tough problems. For example, it lets Yahoo and Microsoft focus on what they are good at. For Yahoo, that's digital lifestyle applications and services and the CPM ad revenues that come with them; for Microsoft, it's Windows and Office (and MSN, I guess….). It's an interesting idea.  But it's one that I don't see happening.  Battelle concedes that it could be a bit far-fetched.  And my main problem with the scenario isn't necessarily the idea itself (I think it could actually turn out to be a decent product).  It's the rationale behind why such a venture is even needed:  A second and substantial reason to do this is to stop trying to kill each other in the race to catch Google. Separately, neither company is going to catch Google anytime soon. Why not work together, combine resources, and give the world what it really wants - a legitimate answer to Mountain View? Is that really what "the world" wants?  No.  It isn't.   Advertisers want it.  Content publishers, website owners, and bloggers want it.  Uber-users want it.  We want something else because we want diversified ways to make lots of money with our websites.  Advertisers want it to get their message out to even more people.  Uber-users want it for any number of reasons (more options, anti-Google sentiments, etc).   Independently Microsoft and Yahoo want to become the "legitimate answer to Mountain View"… but they want that for themselves.  From our outside perspective it might make sense for them to join forces.  But from the perspective of each company, it wouldn't.  Microsoft doesn't want to share their dominance.  Neither does Yahoo.  Both think they can go it alone.   And the rest of the world?  They couldn't care less.  They're happy with Google, Yahoo, or whatever else they use.  There's no public outcry for a better Yahoo or a better MSN/Live.  And both Yahoo and Microsoft know that.  Their strategies are more about getting people locked in or hooked on their existing search technology than answering some non-existent plea from the masses.  People aren't lining up around the corner to beg Microsoft or Yahoo to save them from Google.  They're quite happy with Google.  And it's continually-increasing market share only serves to illustrate that point.   So before any kind of Yahoo-Microsoft merger would be even remotely plausible, a couple of things would have to happen: […]


Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: